Skip to content

Universal Perturbations #132

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 414 commits into
base: better_composer
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Universal Perturbations #132

wants to merge 414 commits into from

Conversation

dxoigmn
Copy link
Contributor

@dxoigmn dxoigmn commented Apr 12, 2023

What does this PR do?

A big missing feature of MART is the ability to generate universal perturbations. This PR tries to change that.

The way universal perturbations should work is that we "train" a perturbation on a dataset and frozen model. Right now we can only generate perturbations in "test" mode, however. This is because it is unclear how to "freeze" a model in MART.

python -m mart experiment=COCO_TorchvisionFasterRCNN_ShapeShifter trainer=gpu

My sense is that Perturber should really just be a LitModular. That will greatly unify everything and make it easier to implement universal perturbations.

This PR depends upon the following PRs:

Type of change

Please check all relevant options.

  • Improvement (non-breaking)
  • Bug fix (non-breaking)
  • New feature (non-breaking)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected)
  • This change requires a documentation update

Testing

Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Consider listing any relevant details of your test configuration.

  • Test A
  • Test B

Before submitting

  • The title is self-explanatory and the description concisely explains the PR
  • My PR does only one thing, instead of bundling different changes together
  • I list all the breaking changes introduced by this pull request
  • I have commented my code
  • I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
  • New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
  • I have run pre-commit hooks with pre-commit run -a command without errors

Did you have fun?

Make sure you had fun coding 🙃

@dxoigmn dxoigmn changed the base branch from main to adversary_as_lightningmodule April 12, 2023 22:44
@dxoigmn dxoigmn mentioned this pull request Apr 14, 2023
15 tasks
@dxoigmn dxoigmn mentioned this pull request Jun 23, 2023
15 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants