Skip to content

Topn lazy materialize poc #50585

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Draft
wants to merge 5 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

HappenLee
Copy link
Contributor

What problem does this PR solve?

Issue Number: close #xxx

Related PR: #xxx

Problem Summary:

Release note

None

Check List (For Author)

  • Test

    • Regression test
    • Unit Test
    • Manual test (add detailed scripts or steps below)
    • No need to test or manual test. Explain why:
      • This is a refactor/code format and no logic has been changed.
      • Previous test can cover this change.
      • No code files have been changed.
      • Other reason
  • Behavior changed:

    • No.
    • Yes.
  • Does this need documentation?

    • No.
    • Yes.

Check List (For Reviewer who merge this PR)

  • Confirm the release note
  • Confirm test cases
  • Confirm document
  • Add branch pick label

@hello-stephen
Copy link
Contributor

Thank you for your contribution to Apache Doris.
Don't know what should be done next? See How to process your PR.

Please clearly describe your PR:

  1. What problem was fixed (it's best to include specific error reporting information). How it was fixed.
  2. Which behaviors were modified. What was the previous behavior, what is it now, why was it modified, and what possible impacts might there be.
  3. What features were added. Why was this function added?
  4. Which code was refactored and why was this part of the code refactored?
  5. Which functions were optimized and what is the difference before and after the optimization?

@HappenLee
Copy link
Contributor Author

run buildall

@HappenLee
Copy link
Contributor Author

run buildall

@doris-robot
Copy link

TeamCity cloud ut coverage result:
Function Coverage: 83.08% (1100/1324)
Line Coverage: 65.88% (18406/27940)
Region Coverage: 65.31% (9122/13967)
Branch Coverage: 55.27% (4906/8876)
Coverage Report: http://coverage.selectdb-in.cc/coverage/2cbb1d855b09c36b2542858b33a6ca4c281d1e4b_2cbb1d855b09c36b2542858b33a6ca4c281d1e4b_cloud/report/index.html

@HappenLee
Copy link
Contributor Author

run buildall

@doris-robot
Copy link

TeamCity cloud ut coverage result:
Function Coverage: 83.08% (1100/1324)
Line Coverage: 65.90% (18412/27940)
Region Coverage: 65.34% (9126/13967)
Branch Coverage: 55.28% (4907/8876)
Coverage Report: http://coverage.selectdb-in.cc/coverage/2cbb1d855b09c36b2542858b33a6ca4c281d1e4b_2cbb1d855b09c36b2542858b33a6ca4c281d1e4b_cloud/report/index.html

@HappenLee
Copy link
Contributor Author

run buildall

@doris-robot
Copy link

TeamCity cloud ut coverage result:
Function Coverage: 83.08% (1100/1324)
Line Coverage: 65.91% (18414/27940)
Region Coverage: 65.34% (9126/13967)
Branch Coverage: 55.25% (4904/8876)
Coverage Report: http://coverage.selectdb-in.cc/coverage/f32bb79ec84cf63dbd55ff438a3b2da14c79e0b7_f32bb79ec84cf63dbd55ff438a3b2da14c79e0b7_cloud/report/index.html

@HappenLee
Copy link
Contributor Author

run buildall

@doris-robot
Copy link

TeamCity cloud ut coverage result:
Function Coverage: 83.08% (1100/1324)
Line Coverage: 65.91% (18416/27940)
Region Coverage: 65.35% (9127/13967)
Branch Coverage: 55.24% (4903/8876)
Coverage Report: http://coverage.selectdb-in.cc/coverage/876d70ea6e5d0e80de065d4718234e8f80bac969_876d70ea6e5d0e80de065d4718234e8f80bac969_cloud/report/index.html

@HappenLee HappenLee force-pushed the topn-lazy-materialize-poc branch from 876d70e to 5484db5 Compare May 4, 2025 15:56
@HappenLee
Copy link
Contributor Author

run buildall

@doris-robot
Copy link

TeamCity cloud ut coverage result:
Function Coverage: 83.08% (1100/1324)
Line Coverage: 65.87% (18403/27940)
Region Coverage: 65.29% (9119/13967)
Branch Coverage: 55.26% (4905/8876)
Coverage Report: http://coverage.selectdb-in.cc/coverage/5484db50726f6cc4f23c66e168e48ad27ce44ccd_5484db50726f6cc4f23c66e168e48ad27ce44ccd_cloud/report/index.html

@HappenLee HappenLee force-pushed the topn-lazy-materialize-poc branch from 5484db5 to 58b6777 Compare May 4, 2025 17:50
@HappenLee
Copy link
Contributor Author

run buildall

@doris-robot
Copy link

TeamCity cloud ut coverage result:
Function Coverage: 83.08% (1100/1324)
Line Coverage: 65.90% (18413/27940)
Region Coverage: 65.33% (9125/13967)
Branch Coverage: 55.25% (4904/8876)
Coverage Report: http://coverage.selectdb-in.cc/coverage/58b677786013942f9c8d78e558e535c0a1833e38_58b677786013942f9c8d78e558e535c0a1833e38_cloud/report/index.html

@hello-stephen
Copy link
Contributor

BE UT Coverage Report

Increment line coverage 41.80% (492/1177) 🎉

Increment coverage report
Complete coverage report

Category Coverage
Function Coverage 55.14% (14977/27160)
Line Coverage 44.40% (132094/297528)
Region Coverage 43.12% (67365/156212)
Branch Coverage 37.59% (33916/90224)

@hello-stephen
Copy link
Contributor

BE Regression && UT Coverage Report

Increment line coverage 77.21% (908/1176) 🎉

Increment coverage report
Complete coverage report

Category Coverage
Function Coverage 69.00% (18393/26658)
Line Coverage 59.63% (177104/297015)
Region Coverage 57.28% (104741/182864)
Branch Coverage 50.41% (51864/102890)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants