Skip to content

Onboard the GitHub Action based Issue-Labeler #61780

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged

Conversation

jeffhandley
Copy link
Member

These workflows replace the issue-labeler implementation that runs as a GitHub app, allowing training and prediction for the repository's labels without the need for an external service.

References:

Once this is merged, I'll run the 'Labeler: Training' workflow to train new prediction models, then 'Labeler: Promotion' workflow to promote the models into active use, and then decommission the integration of the issue-labeler app for this repo.

@jeffhandley jeffhandley requested a review from danmoseley May 2, 2025 23:34
@jeffhandley jeffhandley self-assigned this May 2, 2025
@jeffhandley jeffhandley requested review from wtgodbe and a team as code owners May 2, 2025 23:34
@dotnet-issue-labeler dotnet-issue-labeler bot added the area-infrastructure Includes: MSBuild projects/targets, build scripts, CI, Installers and shared framework label May 2, 2025
Copy link
Member

@wtgodbe wtgodbe left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks!

@jeffhandley
Copy link
Member Author

Thanks, @wtgodbe. Based on feedback on another repo, I just augmented the workflows with more comments and a markdown doc. This should be good to merge though.

Once this is merged, we'll need to run the 'Labeler: Training' workflow to train new prediction models, then 'Labeler: Promotion' workflow to promote the models into active use. I probably don't have permission to do that, but I'm happy to answer questions or help with it.

Once those workflows are run, I will decommission this repo from the legacy service.

@jeffhandley jeffhandley enabled auto-merge (squash) May 6, 2025 22:48
@jeffhandley
Copy link
Member Author

/ba-g The failure is unrelated to adding these workflows

@jeffhandley jeffhandley merged commit 754e56e into dotnet:main May 7, 2025
22 of 23 checks passed
@dotnet-policy-service dotnet-policy-service bot added this to the 10.0-preview5 milestone May 7, 2025
@jeffhandley jeffhandley deleted the jeffhandley/issue-labeler-v2.0.0 branch May 7, 2025 02:17
@jeffhandley
Copy link
Member Author

@wtgodbe @danmoseley I was able to run the Training and Promotion workflows, the Cache Retention workflow, and then I ran an issue prediction and a pull request prediction run over the issues/pulls that had needs-area-label Used by the dotnet-issue-labeler to label those issues which couldn't be triaged automatically . Everything validated, so I decommissioned this repository from the legacy labeler.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
area-infrastructure Includes: MSBuild projects/targets, build scripts, CI, Installers and shared framework
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants