-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 183
suggestion to avoid spam on security ml #796
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Pull Request Overview
This PR updates the security guidelines to reduce spam on the security mailing list by clarifying acceptable reporting practices.
- Adds a statement that there’s no active bug bounty program.
- Introduces a "Reports to avoid" section with specific examples and advice for sending security reports.
security.md
Outdated
learning, include you uncertainty in the object/body of the message. | ||
- You are a security researcher: Verify the tool claim and try to develop |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Typo in the phrase 'include you uncertainty'; consider replacing it with 'include your uncertainty'.
learning, include you uncertainty in the object/body of the message. | |
- You are a security researcher: Verify the tool claim and try to develop | |
learning, include your uncertainty in the object/body of the message. |
Copilot uses AI. Check for mistakes.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I've cleaned up the language a little bit. Will hold off for approval from @rpwagner since he is assigned but IMO this is safe to merge.
If y'all would like me to just merge these kinds of things in the future, let me know. I want to be respectful of the working practices in the security WG which is why I'm holding off!
Yes it's good to have other sec memeber review this, but they are not part of this org, so I can't assign. (one more annoyance of multiple orgs). I open end an issue in jupyter security to review this . |
No description provided.